Tagged: karma Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts
-
hardie karges
-
hardie karges
Buddha Talk 2026: the case for a Modern Unified Buddhism
Hi, I’m Hardie and I’m here to talk about the possibilities for a new modern Buddhism, based on the original ancient principles, but free of any superstitions, and thus perfectly compatible with science. At first glance, that may sound like Secular Buddhism, but that would only be partially true. Because secular Buddhism places little value on religious experience, i.e. feelings, which can be a very valuable addition to any religion, and very important to most. Philosophy is a good substitute for religion, of course, but that doesn’t always help when your life is in danger, and you’re clinging desperately to hope. At times like those it’s nice to believe in something, almost anything will do sometimes. But that is superstition, magic, and sometimes pleading to an extra-terrestrial God to appear in the flesh to interfere in conditions upon our beloved terrestrial Earth. And there is no scientific basis to that, of course. Or is there?
Many Asians act like that is normal, while many Westerners are repelled by the thought, but what did the Buddha believe? It always revolves around karma and rebirth, and while it is clear that the Buddha accepted much of that, it is also clear that those were not his ideas, but borrowings, mostly from the Jains of his place and time, India c. 500 BCE. And you certainly can’t blame him, given the popularity of the notion, which persists to this day. Buddhists hem and haw about what it is that is ‘reborn’ without ever really answering the question, given the strong no-self anatta sentiment, which is central to Buddhism, especially in comparison to the Brahmanistic ‘Hindus’ of his time, who elevated Atman to the Cosmic Self that rules supreme with Brahman. So, if the celebrated Middle Path of Buddhism was a path between luxury and lack, asceticism and celebration, it was also a path between Hinduism and Jainism.
And from that humble beginning, Buddhism divided and conquered until it had spread to almost all Asian countries and became the majority religion of at least seven, which is considerable even if not as many as its rivals Islam and Christianity, and not counting China, Japan, Taiwan, Tibet, and Korea(s), all with sizeable numbers and percentages, but not a clear majority. But that may not be as impressive as it sounds at first if you consider that Buddhism has had longer to develop than most other religions. But that is not what matters now. What matters now is that Buddhism is on a rapid rise, and just when we need it most. Because the earth is in crisis, and the representatives of Buddhism are not pontificating (pun intended), nor sitting idly by. They are walking thousands of miles and even more kilometers. You know who I’m talking about. Yes, I’m talking about those monks walking for peace who caused such a stir in the USA recently.
Their timing was spot on, and their PR was even better, since they managed to win the hearts and minds of many, with their fresh approach and non-political orientation. The politics were always in the background, of course, but fortunately, that’s where it has stayed, for the most part. Others quickly followed suit, since this is part of an age-old tudong tradition in Thailand, if now expanded beyond the original pilgrimages to more symbolic excursions. The best part is that this is more what I call ‘soft Buddhism’, a la Thich Nhat Hanh, i.e. meditation and mindfulness, than the fire and brimstone of Tibetan Buddhism, i.e. Karma (of retribution) and Rebirth (reincarnation). Because the issues of karma and rebirth have always divided modern and traditional Buddhists, just like modern Christians can still believe in Heaven and Hell (as long as they don’t talk about it too much).
Because there is not much difference in the ‘soft Buddhism’ of TNH and W4P’s Bhikku Pannakara, even though the former is from Zen and the latter Theravada, even though the latter also talks about his dog Aloka being reborn as a human. That’s not even Buddha-flavored ‘rebirth’. That’s Hindu reincarnation, just like Tibetan Vajrayana Buddhism, while I favor the Christian ‘rebirth in Spirit’. A Godless world does not have to be an evil place, if Buddhism can unite with Christianity and Hinduism to provide a sympathetic approach to society and politics. Just leave the Karma and the dogma behind. Buddhists have already borrowed ‘lovingkindness’ from Christianity, just as Christians have borrowed meditation from Buddhism and Hinduism. So, Buddhism gets warmer, while Christianity gets cooler, helluva deal. It’s already happening. Stay tuned. Join us.
-
hardie karges
Soft Buddhism, Hard Buddhism, and the Middle Path between…
If there is a convergence of Christianity and Buddhism in the works, as I often think, then I think that will be accomplished by the evolution of ‘soft’ versions of each, which will allow them to mix and mingle almost imperceptibly, which I think is good. Because, even if I have some minor misgivings about Buddhism possibly losing some of its distinctive characteristics, I can assure you that rebirth is not one of them, nor is the vengeful form of ‘hard’ karma that supports it.
In that mindset, the idea is that not only rebirth, but virtually everything, is a result of prior actions, both good and bad, which strictly control present rewards or punishments, to the point that the word ‘karma’, which means ‘actions’ becomes a synonym for the English term ‘fate’. I don’t think that was the Buddha’s intent, but many people have a negative view of the world, and we are all subject to their influence. I prefer a much softer karma, more closely related to the Buddha’s own ‘samma kammanta’, i.e. right actions, as elucidated in the Eightfold Path. Do good actions, and you will receive good things.
And, if that karma of retribution is the ‘hard’ Buddhism which I dislike, then that Eightfold Path, which is the Middle Way between extremes is mainstream Buddhism, which stands like Hegel’s dialectic as a path forward for decision making, which is how I often use it. In this view, ‘Soft’ Buddhism would be the meditation and mindfulness often invoked by those monks walking for Peace and for which many Westerners are poised and ready to adopt whole-heartedly ASAP.
Christianity has a soft mystical side, too, and even a ‘reborn’ side which is preferable to the Hindu reincarnation which often is the source of Buddhist rebirth and which supports a caste and class system which too often follow hereditary priest and warrior affiliations. That is why Buddhism is not popular in India today and good reason to avoid Hinduism like the pandemic. Buddhism and Christianity need fertile ground on which to mix and mingle. That is the Buddhist Middle Way, Hegel notwithstanding…
-
hardie karges
Buddhism: Open Heart, Open Mind, Karma and Magic
Pick up that piece of trash, not because you dropped it, but because someone did, and we’re all in this together, so if you don’t pick it up, then who will? And this goes straight to karma, because that depends on everybody’s cooperation to make the sacred proverb work, not some magic trick by goblins that only work on Sunday. Most religion works like that, accomplishing with mass messaging what no one can accomplish with a simple bag of tricks. The magic is in your belief system, not anyone’s superpowers.
Exploring new worlds is good. Creating them is better. Adapting an old one is maybe best. But isn’t that an act of magic in its own right? Nothing possesses a soul by natural birthright but only by the actions that it performs and the results that accrue to it. This is karma at its best, assuming a form and acting as if it is a free actor on an empty stage, though nothing could be further from the truth. We are all lab rats in one great experiment, and the mind is the master of it all, capable of creating new worlds where none previously existed.
An open mind accepts new ideas. An open heart accepts new people. They’re really the same thing, of course, both simulations of an idea given its place in our bodies and awareness by virtue of its emotional gravity and psychological primacy. Thai language formalizes that idea with the compounding of both organs and concepts into a new compound word jitjai to formalize the marriage and immortalize the union. We can count breaths and even heartbeats to meditate, but we’ll never be able to count brainwaves, I don’t think…
-
hardie karges
Buddhism and Karma Lite
Good karma is more than a healthy bank balance. It involves a healthy dose of kindness and compassion, too. Because karma is not transactional. Karma is relational. It is about the way that things are related more than any scorecard or final reckoning. It is like the special sauce that makes anything taste good that has the good fortune to lie beneath it in a pile of randomly ordered circumstances that happen to occur in succession in a well-ordered life.
But nothing is random, not really. And I don’t mean past-life karma coming back to enact revenge on the present. No, I just mean that there are always Freudian slips and Jungian archetypes that hover slightly in the background of consciousness that betray all efforts of anonymity and even-handedness when confronted with the necessities of justice and equanimity. ‘Karma’ is our work and our efforts, and so ‘good karma’ the best of these in a world of obscure causes and consequences.
But so much or our work never escapes the confines of our own consciousness and consequences, and therein lies the depth charge that keeps giving, for better or worse, modern reactions to previous interactions. It is all a question of balance. If extremes are avoided and conciliation invested, then results will likely be salutary, if not today, then tomorrow. In short: do good things and you will have a good life. Do bad things and you will have a bad life, most likely. Keeping score is not necessary. You will know it by how it feels.
-
hardie karges
Buddhists Walk, not Run, for Peace, not President…
Good things come to those who wait. Instant gratification is cheap, but unfulfilling. Time is the special sauce that adds flavor. And while it’s not something that the Buddha necessarily talked about, I think it goes well with the general thrust of Buddhism, which is essentially a non-thrust. Western action is heavily reactive, leaving no action unanswered, as I hear Mark Z exhort every day: “Engage, engage, engage,” as if social media were like going blindly into an empty void and people have to be reminded to say something to that best friend that they haven’t seen in years.
Apparently, Mark Z has yet to get the word that people leave Facebook just to get away from the toxic level of aggressive behavior that often passes for engagement. Back to the point of the post: maybe if people weren’t so quick to engage, then maybe everybody would be happier for a few more minutes of each day. Those minutes add up and, if nurtured carefully, can make the difference between a bad life and a good one.
If the monks that Walk for Peace accomplish nothing else, then they get the message out for mindfulness and meditation, that action is more important than reaction, especially when that action is a good one. I doubt that the Buddha ever talked about awareness of breath, but that’s what the monks talk about. That’s not Buddhism; that’s Vipassana meditation, so close enough, I guess. The important thing is that it’s non-reactive. Karma is about actions, not reactions. If you have nothing good to give, then SFTU. Again, the Buddha never said that, but someone did.
-
hardie karges
Buddhism and the Sounds of Silence…
Sometimes silence is the best way to celebrate. Not that celebration is necessary, ever, for any reason, but if it is desired, for some reason, then silence is not a bad way to go about it. Because our lives in this world have advanced beyond the simple survival of the individual and by extension the species, to the point where we are at the point of destroying everything we’ve accomplished by the fact that we have over-produced and over-reproduced.
Our individual lives are no longer in imminent danger. But the lives of the species are in terrible danger. And the well-being of the individual is similarly impacted, if no longer in immediate danger of destruction. Still, we have been very successful over the course of our existence, and if that calls for celebration, then let it be silent. Because silence is Buddhism’s secret weapon, best seen in the practice of meditation. And if we need to celebrate in order to propagate, then let it be here, in silence, not in the screaming of flesh.
The path is not always straight or easy. It often seems to go in circles. Patience is the key that unlocks the door to freedom. But this is not an absolute freedom in the Western sense, the freedom to do this and that. That’s a boy’s dream. Girls have responsibilities to fate and the future. That requires discipline and diligence, karma in the truest sense of actions and reactions. That requires little or no flash or flare, just dedication to the cause of righteousness–truth, beauty, and goodness. That is the Middle Path.
-
hardie karges
Buddhism and the Conundrum of Change
Change is not a cause of suffering if things are getting better all the time. That’s the Buddha’s only conceptual mistake, and that’s what makes him so real. The Mahayanists tried to make him perfect, as some transcental manifestation should be, but the historical Buddha was first and foremost a real person with real-world problems, which he tried to renounce, of course. Some modern women take offense to the fact that he left his wife and child behind, but that must be seen within the context. They were well cared for.
But his conceptual blunder, just like Einstein’s ‘cosmological constant’, Jesus’s birds with nests but no barns, and Plato’s perfect dictatorship, show his intrinsic humanity. Everything is subject to revision, and everything is subject to change, even concepts. That is a conceptual necessity, since it can never be proven one way of the other, anyway. But if life is predetermined, then there is no reason to act, either good or bad, and karma loses meaning. Change may appear to be a cause of suffering, if your high status is diminished, but that probably says more about superficial status than change itself.
Christianity thrives on the optimism that change hopefully brings, of course, and the Buddha was certainly right to call BS on that, of course, even if Christianity as such didn’t exist at the time. Bhahmanism did, though, and there are very real similarities. Eternal life is a plaything of children, and we have better things to do, reincarnation ditto. This life and this world require nothing but kindness and compassion.
-
hardie karges
Buddhism: Life, Love, and the Pursuit of Happiness
Live simply to simply live, because everything else is excess. That doesn’t mean that you should limit yourself necessarily, only that you be aware of the repercussions of your decisions. There is a price to pay when your cup ‘runneth over’, too. Nothing is free. If that sounds a lot like karma, that’s because it is, though we’re usually fed karma in its spring-loaded reactionary form, i.e. the effects of karma, actions, more than the actions themselves. It’s a matter of most Buddhist faiths that good actions yield good benefits and bad action the opposite. On that I think that we can all agree.
But if that sounds natural, please be aware that Nature is not always right and good. For one thing, Nature can be extremely violent, while consciousness can be more easily pacified. This is exactly the realization of Buddhism, also. So, while we hold Nature up as a shining beacon of what can be accomplished, we also recognize that it is not the be-all and end-all. Consciousness is–almost. We should be so lucky that we could simply copy Nature and always come out ahead.
Unfortunately, it’s not always that easy, but there are always rewards for good hard honest work. Fortunately, doing nothing is also a sacred privilege in this life in this world, so no one can take that away from you. Some of the finest things in this life would qualify as nothing in many people’s vocabulary. Be aware of every thought, sensation, and feeling that passes through consciousness, accepting all as valid, though none as truth, and that will be plenty for today or any day. Such is meditation.
-
hardie karges
Buddhism on the Installment Plan (with Quick Easy Payments)
If Science conquers Death, then Buddhism may be out of work, but I doubt it. Because, for all the rap about Buddhism being pessimistic, the truth is that it’s not; it’s realistic. Now, that may contrast sharply with the goo-goo eyed optimism of Sunday School Christianity (any denomination) and their doctrines of eternal life and passionate love, but it’s only being realistic—and rational. You’re going to die. Get over it. For an adult, that’s the starting point of any life equation. You’ve got x amount of years to produce y amount of children and z amount of money, so you better get started, because time’s wasting.
Or not. Buddhism always allows for negation in any of its tetralemma style catuhskoti logic, so, if that’s negative, by definition, then so be it. Negation is often the only certainty, just as Emptiness is often the only Eternity. And that is why Buddhism is so often defined by its meditation, which is essentially doing nothing—creatively, watching thoughts come and go while breath counts the time and plays rhythm. But it’s only a partial renunciation, unlike the Jains’ total immersion, from which they seldom emerge. That’s the Middle Path, neither total leisure nor lack, buffet nor snack.
Buddhism is so ‘right’ simply because it’s so simple. Avoid extremes and be nice; seek friends. Because that’s the heart of Buddhist ‘love’, metta, friendship. Ex-Christians try to soup it up by invoking ‘lovingkindness’, with Mary and babe at the breast, but really, it’s just friendship, non-possessive and cool, not hot, male or female, jewelry or not. Feel free to try it at home. It’s non-toxic. Or form a group. Some call it sangha. Others call it family. And don’t forget to wash your karma.
streaming consciousness... 
Reply