Tagged: philosophy Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts
-
hardie karges
-
hardie karges
Buddhism: Living and Dying in ¾ Time…
Fundamental principles stay the same, but situations always change. That’s why I’m here right now, and possibly you, too, if you’re like me and you want to know the truth, and you want it to set you free. That’s what the Christian Scientists used to say until blue in the face when I was a child, so I learned it by heart, whether I really wanted to or not. Because for them to ‘know the truth’ was an all-pervading mantra which supposedly had the power to heal and nothing else was really necessary.
They believed that reality was perfection, and that was our birthright, and all we needed to do was to manifest it. But that was then. And this is now—for me. That was fringe Christianity, this is Buddhism, and still I want to take ancient principles and test them against modern circumstances for veracity and efficacy. But there is a universe of differences between the circumstances of 500 BCE and 1880. Still, both protagonists thought that they had a vision of the truth worth pursuing and still do.
And sure enough, the Zen Buddhism of 500 CE is very different from the Early Buddhism of 500 BCE and looks much more like the fringe Christianity of 1880, with its six perfections and transcendental wisdom. So, Buddhism and Christianity both went through phases of practical application before proceeding to a more ‘transcendental’ phase of perfections and exalted statuses, then a ‘magical’ phase of Vajrayana and New Age mysticism. Neither may be totally right, but the pattern is clear. Once we’ve done the hard work of creating something from nothing, we retrofit the short-cut to prove that’s not what happened at all. It simply manifested. It seems to be a religious, but not philosophical, paradigm. Religions don’t have to make sense. They have to make new converts.
-
hardie karges
The Buddhist Middle Path Between Bliss and Industry
The most difficult attachments are to (our) selves and (our) lives, which almost goes without saying, because what could be more logical and apparently natural? But it’s probably worth the effort to say it, because it may not be natural at all, maybe just the opposite, in fact. Because the only thing connecting it all is consciousness, and that hardly implies attachment, only awareness. This is a core principle of Buddhism, and nothing is more important.
Because once you’ve become attached to yourself, then you will certainly become attached to your wife and your children and your job, as if nothing could be more natural. But there is something almost more natural, and that’s non-attachment. Imagine the bliss that becomes possible by simply being alive without transacting, becoming blissfully wet when it rains and playfully engaged when it dries? So, why don’t animals do that, then, as we imagine they do?
But they don’t, or not totally. Jesus has already been busted for claiming that birds don’t build barns, when in fact they clearly do. In the English language we call them nests. In fact, these birds are a full step ahead of those imaginary ‘present moment’ Buddhists, as they are more like Middle Path Buddhists, splitting the difference between bliss and industry, very much in the moment, but with an eye to the future, too. We humans were once like that, planting seeds but also practicing crafts. Cities should be unnecessary with the advent of high tech. Maybe we should try that.
-
hardie karges
-
hardie karges
Buddhism and the Parable of the Poisoned Arrow
First the Parable of the Prejudicial Porpoise: If it looks like a fish, and acts like a fish, it still might be a mammal, or a shark. Now I don’t spend a lot of time composing parables, or sutras, but if the shoe fits, then I’ll wear it. The point is that things are not always what they seem, and the wise man with limited funds might help himself a bit by defining his circumstances carefully.
The Buddha once said, of course, that the important thing is not whether the criminal was a man or a woman, nor what he or she was wearing, but stopping the flow of blood in the wound, so that the victim can resume a normal life as soon as possible. But sometimes all that extra knowledge can pay off, such as what kind of poisons are involved, the age of the victim, or the exact location of any projectile or sharp-edged object.
So, with all due respect to the Parable of the Poisoned Arrow, Gulamalukya Sutta, and its prohibitions warning again abstract metaphysical abstractions, there is no prohibition against useful knowledge. In this respect Buddhism is in perfect sync with Science and unforgiving to sometimes useless metaphysics.
As always the Middle Path pays off, that Goldilocks ‘sweet spot’ that sometimes defies categorization, and that is at least part of the point. Precise definitions are inherent to Science but sometimes useless to logic. Can’t decide? Split the difference. Make the big decisions later. The important thing is to do something Now, even if it seems almost like nothing…
-
Dr B
My personal view of the poisoned arrow teaching can be summed up with a diagnosis I knew was coming, that I had cancer! But I refused to shoot myself with extra arrows: can it be cured, what’s the treatment, will I die, how long have I got, will it be painful blah blah all in my head. Natural questions maybe, but not before the diagnosis I knew was coming!
-
hardie karges
Yes, cancer is a difficult experience, given all the hype around it. I was there myself some fifteen years ago, borderline stage 3 with the prostate, and here I am now, almost feeling guilty that I didn’t suffer more, like so many do. TBH I usually default to Science, but that wasn’t a good option 2500 years ago. Cheers…
-
-
hardie karges
To be Reborn in the Spirit of the Buddha
Every day should be a re-Birth day, in spirit, not DNA. And, as much as I hate to get involved in the Buddhist rebirth debates and disputes, I’ll have to say that I probably like the Christian use of that term ‘reborn’ more than I like the Buddhist flirtation with Hindu reincarnation. Because the Christian usage is almost always phrased as ‘reborn in the spirit of the Lord’ or something like that, which seems healthy, not superstitious. It might even be for Christians what mindfulness is for Buddhists, a simple way of being, more than anything else.
The Tibetans don’t even pretend otherwise, of course, as they scour the countrysides looking for someone who looks a lot like what a Dalai Lama should look like, while the Mahayanists settle for multiple Buddhist manifestations presumably emanating from some eternal source, and the occasional black-belt Bodhisattva who will assert himself on the field of spiritual battle to prove that such a thing is still possible, the rare individual doing what enlightened beings do, saving the world and making it better for others.
But leave it to the Theravadins to do what Buddha himself did, training himself to a fine fit of a spiritual soldier, ready to forego random desires and craven cravings in order to reduce suffering in the long run and promote inner peace in the short run. And leave it to the Theravadins to walk for months nonstop, too, to promote world peace. That’s what the Buddha would do. Note: I support all schools and sects of Buddhism, but I’m especially proud of Thai Theravadins right now. They’ve truly shown the world something with their Walking for Peace…
-
hardie karges
-
hardie karges
-
hardie karges
Buddhism 499: Taming the Mind…
Treat perfect strangers with the same kindness you give your pets and the world will be a better place. And pets deserve that special treatment, of course, but don’t we all? Because all too often, kindness is transactional, tit for tat, is it not? Yes, it is, whether we even realize it or not, we’re so accustomed to that sort of reciprocity, as long as the dog is loveable, of course, and silently obedient. And many Buddhists do that, also, which is not a bad thing in itself, unless it rewards evil at the same time.
Because justice and fairness is a real thing, too, of course, and that is the flipside to the equation. Pets are a special circumstance in the hierarchy of the world, and I love them greatly, no vestigial nostalgia for the savage wilderness here, no thank you. I wish that every animal in the world could be tamed and therefore survive, rather than live a precarious existence in a world where it is commonly thought that returning an animal to the wilderness is somehow standard logical procedure.
As always, the truth lies somewhere in the middle. Conscientious taming seems perfectly acceptable to me, in lieu of wilderness, but dancing bears would seem to be going too far. But the point is that the kindness so often typically displayed toward our pets de rigueur is often totally lacking in our relationships to our human equals, even when they’ve done much to deserve it. No matter that there are Buddhist websites called Wildmind and so forth, the founding principle of Buddhism is to tame the mind, and that is a very good thing…
-
hardie karges
hardie karges and 
streaming consciousness... 
Reply