Buddhism: Living and Dying in ¾ Time…
Fundamental principles stay the same, but situations always change. That’s why I’m here right now, and possibly you, too, if you’re like me and you want to know the truth, and you want it to set you free. That’s what the Christian Scientists used to say until blue in the face when I was a child, so I learned it by heart, whether I really wanted to or not. Because for them to ‘know the truth’ was an all-pervading mantra which supposedly had the power to heal and nothing else was really necessary.
They believed that reality was perfection, and that was our birthright, and all we needed to do was to manifest it. But that was then. And this is now—for me. That was fringe Christianity, this is Buddhism, and still I want to take ancient principles and test them against modern circumstances for veracity and efficacy. But there is a universe of differences between the circumstances of 500 BCE and 1880. Still, both protagonists thought that they had a vision of the truth worth pursuing and still do.
And sure enough, the Zen Buddhism of 500 CE is very different from the Early Buddhism of 500 BCE and looks much more like the fringe Christianity of 1880, with its six perfections and transcendental wisdom. So, Buddhism and Christianity both went through phases of practical application before proceeding to a more ‘transcendental’ phase of perfections and exalted statuses, then a ‘magical’ phase of Vajrayana and New Age mysticism. Neither may be totally right, but the pattern is clear. Once we’ve done the hard work of creating something from nothing, we retrofit the short-cut to prove that’s not what happened at all. It simply manifested. It seems to be a religious, but not philosophical, paradigm. Religions don’t have to make sense. They have to make new converts.
streaming consciousness... 
Reply