streaming consciousness…

Tagged: Buddhism Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

• 

  hardie karges 3:35 am on January 28, 2024 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: Buddhism, emptiness ( 33 ), Hardie Karges ( 334 ), meditation ( 280 ), philosophy ( 131 ), POETRY ( 12 ), prayer ( 2 ), shunya ( 13 ), shunyata ( 26 ), silence ( 14 ), spirituality ( 27 ), zero ( 14 ), zero point   

  Buddhism and the Power of Silence  

  

  Words once spoken cannot be taken back. Actions once committed cannot be retracted. Silence is better than violence. This is one of the hidden little gems of Buddhism, the value of silence. And other than the emphasis on meditation, it’s something that doesn’t often get mentioned—until now. Because here and now, in the modern age and the Western world, the noise is almost deafening, and the calls to engage are never-ending, no matter that much of that engagement is cruel and disheartening.  

  As a ‘digital creator’ on Facebook, I get it all the time, as if non-engagement were synonymous to incompetence. But nothing could be further from the truth. Silence is not violence, and BLM (Black Lives Matter) should know this. MLK (Martin Luther King) certainly knew it well, as did Mohandas K. (Mahatrma) Gandhi. Silence is one of the most powerful weapons in the world, in fact, but it is also much more than that. As the operating method of meditation, it can save souls (people) and so, it can also save nations.  

  If silence is the zero point for meditation, then meditation is the zero point for life. In this analogy, silence is like the zero (shunya) for which emptiness (shunyata) is named and can be thought of like the mathematical zero as the point between positive and negative (existence or non-existence?) numbers or the absolute zero temperature beneath which there is no lower, or even the zero-point energy of quantum physics as that point closest to absolute stillness. That’s the goal of meditation, insight optional, and that’s the goal of life, if only for a moment, now and again, always and forever. 

   

  Reply Cancel reply

  Required fields are marked *

  Name *

  Email *

  Website

  Notify me of new comments via email.

  Notify me of new posts via email.

  Δ

• 

  hardie karges 4:06 am on January 20, 2024 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: Branhmanism, Buddhism, Divine Feminine, dualism ( 5 ), Hardie Karges ( 334 ), Hinduism ( 33 ), Indra ( 2 ), meditation ( 280 ), mindfulness ( 38 ), non-dualism ( 11 ), philosophy ( 131 ), religion ( 187 ), Sanskrit ( 23 ), spirituality ( 27 )   

  Buddhism and the Divine Feminine  

  

  Is a creator God a product of patriarchy? Probably. Buddhism doesn’t need it, regardless. Buddhism embodies the Divine Feminine, whether it knows it or not. This goes way back, of course, even before the Abrahamic religions, at least as far back as the Sanskrit-era Dyaus Pitr (think Deus Pater) ‘Sky Father’ of the proto-Hindu Rigveda, and probably before that. But Sky Father was always with Earth Mother Prithvi Mata, and that pretty much defines the Hindu/Buddhist dichotomy that dominated the philosophical debates of 500 BCE India, Hinduism the more male-dominant principle, Buddhist the more female-dominant. 

  And this is important, even if it is seldom stated, or even acknowledged, given the lesser status of Buddhist nuns, in comparison to their male counterparts. But it’s there, and it’s true, from what I can see, and that is good. It means that Buddhism is non-agressive, and that is purpose-built, in stark opposition to the early Brahmanistic war god Indra, which Buddhism refuses to acknowledge as its heritage. It also means that Buddhism is more concerned with down-to-earth issues of kindness, and craving, than abstract considerations of dualism vs. non-dualism. 

  Thus, Buddhism embodies many of the qualities often associated with the ‘divine feminine,’ such as ‘intuition, nurturing, creativity, empathy, and wisdom’ (www.anahana.com). So, it should be unnecessary to say that Buddhism is not a conquering religion, unless you count the hearts and minds conquered, not bodies inscribed with epithets and enlisted in future wars with imaginary enemies. Buddhism is better than that. Conquer yourself and you will have conquered the world, your world… 
   
• 

  hardie karges 3:25 am on January 14, 2024 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: Buddhism, craving ( 16 ), discipline ( 4 ), Four Noble Truths ( 19 ), Hardie Karges ( 334 ), meditation ( 280 ), mindfulness ( 38 ), religion ( 187 ), suffering ( 31 )   

  Buddhism 102: the Cessation of Craving  

  

  If you indulge cravings, then there’s no end to them, just mindless consumption. It’s better to cut them off at the source, your mind. This lies at the heart of Buddhism and is enshrined in the Second of Four Noble Truths as the primary cause of suffering. There are other causes, too, and so other forms of suffering, but this is the main one, and the one for which Buddhism is famous. After all, what is more insufferable than craving and its deleterious effects? 

  Well, that is a debatable point, but most importantly, craving is the one cause of suffering that we are most able to do something about, in order to effect a positive change in that status. Old age and many forms of sickness leave us at their not-so-tender mercies to live or die, but craving is just a clownish monster, mocking our every move, and our every intent to free ourselves from its hideous grip, adding insult to injury, when what we really need is encouragement to succeed.  

  Because craving is akin to addiction, and this is one of the most hideous of worldly phenomena that we must deal with in the course of our short lives, the inability to free ourselves from the grips of habits and substances which are harmful to us, even when we are fully mindful of that fact. But the craving is mindless, not mindful. And so that is where we must nip it in the bud, at the point where the mind has made an unconscious allowance that facilitates this perversion of intent. 

  It is of no importance that the mind may have no more intrinsic importance than the craving, either, or ourselves, for that matter. What is important is that we cease the defilement at the source, rather than make excuses for our failings. And the source is will or lack thereof. If you are willing to allow cravings to control you, then they will do so, without fail. Only if you are willing to exert some discipline can you truly defeat the monsters that inhabit the subconscious realm of craving. Only then are you truly a disciple of the Buddha.  

   
• 

  hardie karges 4:20 am on December 30, 2023 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: awareness ( 5 ), Buddhism, CHRISTIANITY ( 170 ), Hardie Karges ( 334 ), ISLAM ( 68 ), meditation ( 280 ), mindfulness ( 38 ), passion ( 9 ), philosophy ( 131 ), religion ( 187 ), suffering ( 31 )   

  Buddhism in the Balance, Aware and Mindful…  

  

  You don’t have to fight for your religion, like Christians do. You don’t have to surrender to your religion, like Muslims do. You can just be, right in the center, with eyes open or closed, aware and mindful, with no particular judgements to make either way, good or bad, offensive or non-offensive. This is the way Buddhism works, simple yet effective, with no ribbons or bows, and no deep bows, except the ones you make to the senior monk when in his presence.  

  Christianity is a religion of passion: weeping, wailing and all that gospel. Islam is a religion of submission. Buddhism is a way of life dispassionate, quiet, serene, full of passion only in the original sense of passion as suffering, the stuff of life in this material world, long before someone decided that it could be fun, as long as someone else was suffering more or worse than you. Because suffering exists, whether we are in the throes of it or not, and the only way out is to give it no quarter.  

  So, the way to deal with suffering is to remove its source of sustenance, the craving and lust which it consumes for breakfast and lunch, hunger and thirst of the craven kind, crude and rude, cowardly and unforgiving in its lack of moral distinction. But this kind of turpitude depends on negligence for its survival, inattention to all detail and the passive acceptance of all things most easily proffered. Buddhism has no such luxury. Buddhism demands awareness, and mindfulness, and wakefulness to the sleepy dream that is all too often the standard for life. It’s never too late to meditate… 

   
• 

  hardie karges 3:38 am on December 23, 2023 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: Buddhism, craving ( 16 ), Hardie Karges ( 334 ), meditation ( 280 ), mindfulness ( 38 ), philosophy ( 131 ), Science ( 27 ), suffering ( 31 ), Zen ( 32 )   

  Buddhism and Non-Possession  

  

  I travel these lands as if I owned them, when in fact I own nothing, not even my own body parts. And that’s good, because if I owned anything really and truly then I’d be attached to them, till death do us part. That’s no good, because attachments are tantamount to craving, and clinging, Buddhist no-no’s from the word ‘go’. Why? Because they’ll always cause suffering, later if not sooner, and that’s gospel, according to the Buddha. But that’s a sharp contrast, of course, to the typical Western habit of consumption and possession, as if the more we purchase, then the happier we’ll be. 

  Nothing could be further from the truth, of course. In fact, the truth is probably just the opposite: the more we possess, the more miserable we are. But don’t try to convince a rich person of that—or a poor one. Because the truth is not to be found in stats or specs, but in the internal subjective application of deep feeling to the miscellaneous circumstances of life. Scientific proof, and much less truth, can only go so far. You can’t prove happiness, any more than you can prove compassion. But you can feel it. And you’ll know it when you feel it.  

  So, that’s what’s important, and that’s all that we should expect from any religion or philosophy. Because science is better equipped to tell us what the universe is composed of, and how it works, so Buddhism probably shouldn’t waste its time rehashing old themes and memes from two to three thousand years ago as if deep introspection were capable of the same rigorous experiments as science. It’s not. Buddhism is here to tell us how to live our lives. Be kind. Reduce suffering by reducing craving. That’s all. Merry Christmas… 

   
• 

  hardie karges 3:12 am on November 20, 2023 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: Alexander, Brahminists ( 2 ), Buddhism, CHRISTIANITY ( 170 ), FUTURE ( 8 ), Gymnosophists, Hardie Karges ( 334 ), India ( 16 ), Jains ( 2 ), language ( 225 ), Plato ( 17 ), Pythagoras, religion ( 187 )   

  Buddhism and Christianity in the Future of the World…  

  

  Christianity was perhaps better to develop a raw wild unruly world. But Buddhism is better to sustain it. All of which avoids the issue of whether we will survive or not. But, isn’t it better to have developed the world and lost, than never to have developed it at all? Hmmm, I’m not sure, because it seems that we could have developed mentally, and consciously, without ever filling the landfills with so much kitchen appliance junk that our lives are full of, whether we ever perfect the perfect counter-top blender or not. Remember them? 

  But, one thing is for sure: if our civilization collapses, future archeologists will certainly have fun trying to figure it all out, assuming that the historical narrative is fundamental to that civilization, so, it, too, will also likely be lost. Only time will tell, because war is so fundamental to civilization, that to lay down arms, in an effort to reconcile our differences, would be seen as treason to many a competing contender to world dominance. Such is our world and our lives.  

  With the recognition that northern India and modern Europe are genetically related, it must have been interesting to sit around gatherings on the northern steppes when they all spoke a common language, but with apparently different opinions. Because northern Indian philosophy has offered a distinct alternative to the European analytical quest since time immemorial, and that is the milieu from which Buddhism arises, debates with the Brahminists and the Jains.  

  But the Platonists and Pythagoreans had their own issues, never the twain to meet, until Alexander sought the Gymnosophists there in India and the East and West renewed their long conversation left behind on the northern steppes. Now here we sit, trying to make sense of it all, human diversity trying to respond to natural laws, which can only be surmised and rarely proven in the first place or the second instance, and so the only satisfaction lies in trying—or not, if you’re a renunciant.  

   
• 

  hardie karges 4:57 am on November 6, 2023 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: Buddhism, donation, empathy ( 6 ), giving, Hardie Karges ( 334 ), meditation ( 280 ), scam, scammer   

  Buddhism and the Joy of Giving  

  

  Give without concern about what you will get in return, except for the joy of giving. This is the simplest thing in the world, but also the hardest: simple to understand, but hard to carry out. Because so many of us are accustomed to approaching life as transactional, that it’s hard to see it as empathetic, or even sympathetic, sometimes. Sure, this is a principle easy to understand in the abstract, but not so easy to put down funds with no guarantee in return, not even the joy of giving, necessarily, depending on the habits of the receiving party. 

  Because, if you’re expecting profuse appreciation and lavish attention, then you may be disappointed. One of the reasons that needy people are so needy is that they’ve sometimes, but not always, missed out on the social niceties that make life enjoyable: please, thank you, hello, goodbye, and I love you. But even those niceties can be transactional, if they are used as bargaining chips in the process of negotiation, which was probably never intended to be a negotiation in the first place. 

  But such is the status of our modern online world of scams and scammers: they’ll contact you, don’t worry. So, do you just blow them off? Or do you politely listen to them and then blow them off? Does that feel better? Because it’s always about feeling, whether they’re love scammers or orphanages in Uganda: pulling heartstrings for purse strings. You’re enticed to donate money, for which you will feel good in return. And that’s fine. This is a world of feeling, after all. But don’t get angry, if it isn’t everything you expected. Give for the joy of giving, nothing more nothing less. 

   
• 

  hardie karges 5:23 pm on October 29, 2023 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: anatta ( 24 ), Buddhism, Hardie Karges ( 334 ), non-self ( 4 ), past lives ( 9 ), rebirth ( 40 ), reincarnation ( 14 )   

  Buddhism, Non-duality, and the Imminent Death of Ego  

  

  Obsession with non-self can be another form of attachment to ego, though caution should probably be advised, since our modern definition of ‘ego’ is so heavily influenced by that of Freud. The Buddha was a Jungian, haha, no, I’m serious, what with the mass subconscious and all that rap. But ‘ego’ makes the rounds regularly in modern Buddhist circles, even though ‘self’ or even ‘soul’ is probably the better translation of atta. The Buddha knew nothing of id and superego, not in the Freudian sense of the tripartite personality that includes ego. 

  But the concept of personality is one that should probably get more play in the Buddhist and non-dualistic press, since that offers a convenient compromise between dualism and non-dualism, or self and non-self. Because the original issue between the Buddhists and Brahmanists (early ‘Hindus’) was whether we had permanent enduring transmigratory selves, i.e. souls, or not, not whether we have personalities. And modern non-dualists have gone too far, IMHO, in proclaiming (yes, proclaiming) that since we have no souls, or selves, then we are essentially nothing. 

  Non-dualism may be the ‘wild west’ of spirituality right now, with many vague certainties, but I think that’s an accurate assessment. But the Buddha never said that, certainly. Why would he prescribe an Eightfold Path for non-entities with no free will and capable of nothing? He wouldn’t. He laid out an Eightfold Path for these transient personalities named Hardie and Jane and Bocephus, so that we would have a clue for what to do in our short stays in this planetary existence, regardless of whether anything goes on after or not.  

  His own sympathies seemed to be divided, too, since his early doctrine of anatta, non-self, is one of the pillars of Buddhism. The Hindu doctrine of reincarnation was picking up steam, though, and the Buddha seemed influenced by it, as were many, so much so that the related concept of ‘rebirth’ found its place in the Buddhist narrative. Since that implies past lives, though, then that’s reason for doubt, given that the Buddha’s deathbed count of 100k past lives would predate Homo Sapiens. Such are the issues we deal with in an evolving faith and practice. Cool. Enjoy the ride. Just be kind, like the doctor prescribed. 

  hardie karges and Nina Lydia are discussing. Toggle Comments

   
  • 

    Nina Lydia 7:19 am on October 30, 2023 Permalink | Reply

    Interesting post. I agree with “Obsession with non-self can be another form of attachment to ego.” There are many lifestyle Buddhists these days. No-self can be a difficult concept, just like rebirth. There is no separate self, and this body will transform into ashes or soil with some bones left. However, our Karma will go on and have an effect after we’re gone.

    • 

      hardie karges 5:38 am on November 6, 2023 Permalink | Reply

      Thanks for your comment, Nina…

• 

  hardie karges 3:09 am on October 21, 2023 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: anatta ( 24 ), arahat, bodhisattva ( 10 ), Brahmanism ( 9 ), Buddhism, Hardie Karges ( 334 ), Jainism ( 13 ), language ( 225 ), Mahayana ( 49 ), meditation ( 280 ), nirvana ( 14 ), non-dualism ( 11 ), religion ( 187 ), shunyata ( 26 ), Taoism ( 3 ), Theravada ( 55 )   

  Buddhism 201: Theravada and Mahayana  

  

  The difference between Theravada and Mahayana is the difference between Self and Other, if there is one. If you’re a ‘non-dualist,’ then there is none, though that defies common-sense logic, which seems to show a diversity of disparate objects. So, that is the point of the new religion, I suppose, to unify existence, since you gotta’ have something to believe in for a religion to have its raison d’etre. But Buddhism wasn’t concerned with such metaphysical stretches, or at least not in the beginning, though Mahayana was the evolution of a more metaphysical stage of Buddhism.  

  That coincided with a geographical transition from India toward Central Asia and then China, and which also coincided with the evolution of Taoism, so more fertile ground to plow right then and there. If the origins of early Buddhism were all about a debate (and competition) with the Brahmanists and Jains of India, then the evolution of Mahayana was all about a competition with the Taoists in China. By that time, with the shunyata ‘emptiness’ doctrine of Nagarjuna, Buddhist and Taoist metaphysics were not far apart, the main difference between the two apparently that the Buddhists were—and are—far superior meditators.  

  And if Theravadan anatta had evolved into Mahayana shunyata, then Theravadan arahats had evolved into Mahayanan bodhisattvas, the spiritually enlightened beings who forego nirvana until everyone is ready for that final step. Arahats were more content to keep it to themselves, each at his own pace. But the issue of Self and Other is a non-issue if there is no substantive Self; so how could there be a substantive Other? Still, we live our lives in the common-sense world of apparently diverse beings, and so it is there that we must find solutions to common-sense problems. My conclusion? Save yourself, and then save the world. Good luck out there. 

   
• 

  hardie karges 3:40 am on October 7, 2023 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: abundance ( 7 ), Buddhism, capitalism ( 26 ), CHRISTIANITY ( 170 ), global warming ( 16 ), Hardie Karges ( 334 ), myth, Protestant ( 2 ), religion ( 187 ), Thailand ( 82 ), zero-sum   

  Buddhist Self-Sufficiency Trumps Christian Abundance  

  

  Overflowing abundance is a myth, but there is always enough, just enough. And that’s probably an act of faith, also, but preferable to the call for gluttony. Because that’s what abundance signifies: more than enough, all you can eat, sky is the limit, all that Christian mythology that spurs capitalism, Protestant individualism, global warming and war, as if winner takes all in a zero-sum game. But why would that be the case, since it clearly is contradictory?  

  If there are unlimited resources, then there should be plenty to go around for everybody, but that’s not the way it works, apparently. It seems that it doesn’t really count until counted. Until then it’s just religion, myth and ritual, designed to encourage the gods as much as to propitiate them, since they are the gatekeepers of these mythical resources. So, Christianity shoots itself in the foot by trying to claim more than it can realistically access. Abundance, i.e. unlimited resources, are useless if not freely available. 

  Buddhism makes no such outrageous claims, but ‘just enough’ can be easily surmised if not statistically proven, with much better results than the Christian hubristic assertion. And that’s what the previous king of Thailand did with his theory of self-sufficiency, พอเพียง, ‘just enough,’ which, from a Buddhist standpoint, is a self-adjusting mechanism as much as a statistical reality. Whatever there is, it’s ‘just enough,’ as long as you can adjust your desires accordingly. This is classic Buddhism at its best, and a win-win situation for all. Don’t be greedy.