streaming consciousness…

Tagged: Right Thought Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

• 

  hardie karges 2:11 am on February 22, 2026 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: Brahmanism ( 9 ), Buddhism ( 438 ), dialectic ( 14 ), Franz Ferdinand ( 3 ), Hardie Karges ( 249 ), Hegel ( 5 ), Hindu ( 9 ), Jainsim, meditation ( 199 ), religion ( 162 ), Right Action ( 3 ), Right Thought, Right Words, Three Poisons ( 3 )   

  Buddhism, the Four Poisons, and a Self with no Face…  

  

  Jealousy is maybe more insidious even than greed, hate and delusion, because it has no face, just a false self reflected in thousands of tiny mirrors. And that self is the original conundrum, of course, between Buddhism, Jainism, and Hindu Brahmanism, the source of much contention and spirited debate. Because, when Buddhism crowned itself as the Middle Path between excesses of luxury and lack, it also defined itself as the Middle path between (Hindu) Brahmanism and Jainism, the one full of noise and ceremony, and the other full of silence and fasting—slowly. 

  Buddhism famously split the difference, of course, advocating the mediation between extremes in some sort of dialectical approach that might easily resemble the thesis, antithesis, and synthesis that Hegel would elaborate more than two thousand years later. The beautiful part of this approach is that it not only avoids those pesky extremes, but it also provides a way forward in any ever-changing world in which the only certainty is negation. But that jealousy will fade when it has nothing to fall back on, no false identity or permanent traits which too often define a being in this life in this world.  

  Because, in many opinions, that is all we have to buy or sell on the free market for souls in a world where matter in motion is the only alternative. This world is but a simulation of the real world, though, in which light is the only medium and love is the only exchange. You can grab it fast or you can make it last, and the balance between the two is even better. So, let’s make a shopping list for our Eightfold Path. Right thoughts, right words, and right action are more than the lyrics to a song by Franz Ferdinand. It’s a way of life.

   

  Reply Cancel reply

  Required fields are marked *

  Name *

  Email *

  Website

  Notify me of new comments via email.

  Notify me of new posts via email.

  Δ

• 

  hardie karges 12:05 pm on October 30, 2022 Permalink | Reply
  Tags: Aristotle ( 3 ), Buddhism ( 438 ), Hardie Karges ( 249 ), neuroscience ( 2 ), non-dualism ( 11 ), Plato ( 17 ), religion ( 162 ), Right Thought, Samma sankapppa   

  The Role of Thought in Buddhism… 

  

  

  The Buddha never taught or recommended No Thought, an idea popular in some Buddhist and all ‘non-dualistic’ groups, which should be labeled ‘non-pluralistic,’ btw, just saying. The Buddha taught Right Thought, samma samkappa. But don’t thoughts sometimes just pop up? Yes, they do. the issue here is not one of ownership, though, but the true nature of thoughts and feelings. For some reason, we tend to trust our feelings, but reserve much suspicion toward our thoughts. But are they any different, really?

  So, maybe they are as different as heart and head, but is that any different, either, really? Because those bodily locations have only been known since recently, but the concept of Mind, as citta, has been known since almost forever, and certainly since the time of Buddha. Indeed, during the Buddha’s time, and even later, there was considerable debate in Greece, and possibly India, over the location of the origin of thought, such that Plato placed it at or in the brain, while his student Aristotle placed it firmly in the heart.

  And if it seems obvious that the source of all sensations originating in the eyes, ears, nose, and mouth could only logically be mixed and matched somewhere nearby such as the gray matter that constitutes a brain, then it is equally plausible that the center could be where the pathways of the blood start and finish, itself perhaps the mechanism for mixing and matching those sensations into more complex feelings and thoughts. Modern neuroscience has come a long way since then, of course, but still we ‘listen to our hearts,’ even if we prefer to ‘use our brains’ for the heavy lifting, intellect being generally considered superior to intuition.  

  That distinction is sometimes used to differentiate men and women, to generally ill effect, but the fact remains that the two activities are intertwined. But to imagine that thoughts have no proper human origin nor intention, per the ‘non-dualist’ screed, is absurd and counterproductive, and for what purpose it is not clear. Even if Buddhism is technically non-dualist, in the sense that ‘we are one with everything’ like the joke about the monk ordering hot dogs, the modern ‘non-dualists’ go much too far in asserting that we are therefore nothing. That may pay well in the online debates, but it’s not what the Buddha said, and that is my only concern. Think good thoughts.